WEEK 3/APRIL 28TH READING JACQUES RANCIÈRE I

-


NOTE(UPDATED):


Sequence of reading:
Week 3----"regimes of the arts" Reading No. 1+ No.3
Week 4----"Partage du sensible’: the Distribution of the sensible" No. 4+ No. 3
Week 5----No. 2

 Please come either with your question(s) or a keyword/concept (with an example).

Required Reading (for Week 3-5):

1. Deranty, Jean-Philippe. “Regimes of the arts”, in Jacques Rancière: Key Words, edited by Jean-Philippe Deranty, Acumen Publishing Limited, 2010, pp116-130
[download HERE together with No. 4--they are put in ONE PDF file]

2. Rancière, Jacques. “Aesthetics as Politics” Aesthetics And Its Discontents, translated from the French by Steven Corcoran, Polity, 2009, pp19-44
[distribute in class]

3. Tanke, Joseph J. “Chapter 3: Retrieving the Politics of Aesthetics”, Jacques Rancière: An Introduction—Philosophy, Politics, Aesthetics, Continuum, pp73-109
[distribute in class]

4. Panagia, Davide. “’Partage du sensible’: the Distribution of the sensible”, in Jacques Rancière: Key Words, edited by Jean-Philippe Deranty, Acumen Publishing Limited, 2010, pp95-103



5. Wolters, Eugene. “Who the Fuck is Jacques Rancière”, http://www.critical-theory.com/who-the-fuck-is-jacques-ranciere/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advertising and Consumer Culture

-
Dear all, Please prepare for your presentation by referring to the following documents: RR: Sturken & Cartwright,279-306 (chapter 7) SR: Slavoj Zizek, Back to School 2003, Abercrombie & Fitch Quarterly (PDF) both documents could be downloaded from here https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8h2bh7e6w5hkl2t/AAA02J9eOvJibkX1XtUh5nVNa if you have problem downloading, please email me to let me know
Read more

questions for Week 8 ★June 2rd & Make-up session (same day)

-
Image
Week 8 ★ June 2rd     Discussion Session Required Readings Dorman, Andrew. (2016). “Introduction” & “Cultural Specificity and Globalization”. Paradoxical Japaneseness: Cultural Representation in 21st Century Japanese Cinema . Palgrave McMillian. 1)     What is D’s basic assumption on ‘cultural specificity’ (think of our previous discussions of ‘multiculturalism’) and the ‘paradoxical nature’ of a national cinema? In other words, how has he tried to avoid the essentialist stance in tacking the ‘specificity’? Your thoughts? Try to recapitulate his points/framework apropos of Japanese cinema in one line. 2)     For D then, how do framings of ‘cultural concealment’ and ‘cultural performance’ connect with his major points, and his case studies, which range from specific filmmakers, production dynamics to (strategies for/of) film festivals? You thoughts/critiques? 3)     Review D’s discussions of national cinema, nation-state and globalization. What are his maj
Read more

Week 7★May 25th ACTING AGAINST THE REGIME: ACT OF KILLING

-
Image
Special Screening The Act of Killing                               Dir. Joshua Oppenheimer, 2012                                               Time: May 21 st Monday, 4:30 pm/Venue: Rm 131 Required Reading s : Camilla Møhring Reestorff (2015) Unruly artivism and the participatory documentary ecology of  The Act ofKilling , Studies in Documentary Film , 9:1, 10-27, DOI:10.1080/17503280.2014.1002248 Added Reference Reading Robert Cribb (2014) THE ACT OF KILLING , Critical Asian Studies, 46:1, 147-149, DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2014.867621 Rojas, Nubia. " Documentary cinema, memory and reconciliation: Aninterview with Joshua Oppenheimer, director of" The Act ofKilling "." Glocal Times 20 (2014).
Read more