Response Paper, 2020 Due on July 11th, by 5pm

-
Submit it via email to maran@nagoya-u.jp
NOTE: if you have not received my confirmation mail after the submission, mail me again; my university mail sometimes is not compatible with your mail system.

BASICS
1)     All my postgraduate students (PhD/MA) students (regardless of your registration status) are expected to submit ONE 500-800 word response paper (in WORD document); for research students, it is an option;

2)     For this assignment, you should work on a specific topic from the syllabus (NOT possible to work on irrelevant topics, like a chapter from your own thesis), and you should engage with at least TWO reading(s) from the syllabus, and ONE external reading;

3)     The submitted WORD file should contain “SEMINAR20” + the student’s name in its file name;

4)     Preferred referencing style is Harvard (a link of the style has been embedded in the first post in our course blog). Please self-study the style (Citation Tools will help you to do the job effectively!).

Don’t be overly concerned with grammar (although spell-check will be helpful!), but do put a lot of thinking into your reading journals since they will be key to fruitful discussions in class and even your final paper.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advertising and Consumer Culture

-
Dear all, Please prepare for your presentation by referring to the following documents: RR: Sturken & Cartwright,279-306 (chapter 7) SR: Slavoj Zizek, Back to School 2003, Abercrombie & Fitch Quarterly (PDF) both documents could be downloaded from here https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8h2bh7e6w5hkl2t/AAA02J9eOvJibkX1XtUh5nVNa if you have problem downloading, please email me to let me know
Read more

questions for Week 8 ★June 2rd & Make-up session (same day)

-
Image
Week 8 ★ June 2rd     Discussion Session Required Readings Dorman, Andrew. (2016). “Introduction” & “Cultural Specificity and Globalization”. Paradoxical Japaneseness: Cultural Representation in 21st Century Japanese Cinema . Palgrave McMillian. 1)     What is D’s basic assumption on ‘cultural specificity’ (think of our previous discussions of ‘multiculturalism’) and the ‘paradoxical nature’ of a national cinema? In other words, how has he tried to avoid the essentialist stance in tacking the ‘specificity’? Your thoughts? Try to recapitulate his points/framework apropos of Japanese cinema in one line. 2)     For D then, how do framings of ‘cultural concealment’ and ‘cultural performance’ connect with his major points, and his case studies, which range from specific filmmakers, production dynamics to (strategies for/of) film festivals? You thoughts/critiques? 3)     Review D’s discussions of national cinema, nation-state and globalization. What are his maj
Read more

Week 7★May 25th ACTING AGAINST THE REGIME: ACT OF KILLING

-
Image
Special Screening The Act of Killing                               Dir. Joshua Oppenheimer, 2012                                               Time: May 21 st Monday, 4:30 pm/Venue: Rm 131 Required Reading s : Camilla Møhring Reestorff (2015) Unruly artivism and the participatory documentary ecology of  The Act ofKilling , Studies in Documentary Film , 9:1, 10-27, DOI:10.1080/17503280.2014.1002248 Added Reference Reading Robert Cribb (2014) THE ACT OF KILLING , Critical Asian Studies, 46:1, 147-149, DOI: 10.1080/14672715.2014.867621 Rojas, Nubia. " Documentary cinema, memory and reconciliation: Aninterview with Joshua Oppenheimer, director of" The Act ofKilling "." Glocal Times 20 (2014).
Read more